|
:''Neo-Orthodoxy can also refer to a form of Orthodox Judaism following the philosophy of "Torah im Derech Eretz", and can additionally refer to the ideas of late 20th century Eastern Orthodox theology, e.g. chiefly by Christos Yannaras'' Neo-orthodoxy, in Europe also known as theology of crisis and dialectical theology, is an approach to theology in Protestantism developed in the aftermath of the First World War (1914–18). It is characterized as a reaction against doctrines of 19th-century liberal theology and a reevaluation of the teachings of the Reformation. It is primarily associated with Karl Barth (1886–1968), Friedrich Gogarten (1887–1967), Eduard Thurneysen (1888–1974), Rudolf Bultmann (1884–1976), Emil Brunner (1899–1966),〔〔 and Reginald H. Fuller (1915-2007).〔Douglas Martin, 2007. ("Reginald H. Fuller, 92, New Testament Scholar, Dies," ) ''The New York Times'', April 14.〕 Barth himself expressed his unease in the use of the term.〔.〕 ==Revelation== Neo-orthodoxy strongly emphasises the revelation of God by God as the source of Christian doctrine.〔 Meister and Stump. (2010). "Christian Thought: A Historical Introduction". Routedge, p. 449.〕 In contrast Natural theology, whose proponents include Thomas Aquinas, states that knowledge of God can be gained through a combination of observation of nature and human reason; this issue remains a controversial topic within some circles of Christianity to this day.〔 McGrath. (2013). "Christian History: An Introduction". Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 290-292.〕 Barth totally rejects natural theology. "So far as theological content is concerned, Barth's argument runs like this. If the God whom we have actually come to know through Jesus Christ really ''is'' Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in his own eternal and undivided Being, then what are we to make of an independent natural theology that terminates, not upon the Being of the Triune God—i.e., upon God as he really is in himself—but upon some Being of God in general? Natural theology by its very operation abstracts the existence of God from his act, so that if it does not begin with deism, it imposes deism upon theology." Brunner, on the other hand, believed that natural theology still had an important, although not decisive, role. This led to a sharp disagreement between the two men, the first of several controversies that prevented the movement from acquiring a unified, homogeneous character. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Neo-orthodoxy」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|